<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Migrate to a group
pool &quot;repacks&quot; the selected files over the pools that comprise
the group IN THE ORDER SPECIFIED UP TO THE SPECIFIED LIMIT for each pool.
&nbsp;To see this work, in your case, set a limit that is near the current
occupancy of pool 'ssd'.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">For example: </span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">RULE
\u2018gp\u2019 GROUP POOL \u2018gpool\u2019 is \u2018ssd\u2019 &nbsp;LIMIT(50) then \u2018disk1\u2019</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br></span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Notice the documentation
says the LIMIT defaults to 99.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Also, if you've
run the same policy before and nothings changed much, then of course, there's
not going to be much &quot;repacking&quot; to be done, maybe not any.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">If the behaviour
still doesn't make sense to you, try testing on a tiny file system with
just a few small pools, sizing pools and files so that only a few files
will fit in a pool... &nbsp;If you build such a test scenario and that
still doesn't make sense, show us the example...</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">-----------------------------------</span><br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">From:
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">&quot;Powell
(US), Richard E&quot; &lt;Richard.E.Powell@boeing.com&gt;</span><br><br><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Hi all,</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">&nbsp;</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">I\u2019m trying to use
the \u201cGROUP POOL\u201d feature for file migration with FILE_HEAT, similar to
one of the ilm sample scripts. &nbsp;The problem I\u2019m having is that it
seems to be identifying the candidates correctly but, anytime I use the
\u201cgroup pool\u201d name for the \u201cto pool\u201d, it only selects the first candidate
for migration. &nbsp;If I specify a single pool name for the \u201dto pool\u201d,
it selects multiple files as expected.</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">&nbsp;</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Here are the policy
rules I\u2019m using:</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">&nbsp;</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">RULE \u2018gp\u2019 GROUP
POOL \u2018gpool\u2019 is \u2018ssd\u2019 then \u2018disk1\u2019</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">RULE \u2018repack\u2019 MIGRATE
FROM POOL \u2018gpool\u2019 TO POOL \u2018gpool\u2019 WEIGHT(FILE_HEAT)</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">&nbsp;</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">I\u2019m not sure if
I\u2019m misunderstanding something or if this is a real bug. &nbsp;I\u2019m just
wondering if anyone else has run into this issue?</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">&nbsp;</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">I\u2019m running 4.2.3.8
on RHEL 6.</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">&nbsp;</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Thanks!</span><br><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Richard</span><br><BR>