<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Hi All,
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">
<div class=""> 26 mmbackupDors-20171023.log</div>
<div class=""> 26 mmbackupDors-20171024.log</div>
<div class=""> 26 mmbackupDors-20171025.log</div>
<div class=""> 26 mmbackupDors-20171026.log</div>
<div class=""> 2922752 mmbackupDors-20171027.log</div>
<div class=""> 1375555 mmbackupDors-20171028.log</div>
<div class=""> 59328 mmbackupDors-20171029.log</div>
<div class=""> 2748095 mmbackupDors-20171030.log</div>
<div class=""> 124953 mmbackupDors-20171031.log</div>
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">That\u2019s \u201cwc -l\u201d output \u2026 and the difference in size occurred with the GPFS 4.2.3.5 upgrade. I\u2019m not technically \u201cresponsible\u201d for mmbackup here, so I\u2019m not at all familiar with it. However, we\u2019ve asked a certain vendor (not IBM) about it and
they don\u2019t know either, so I don\u2019t feel too awfully bad.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">And we have looked at the man page and didn\u2019t see any obvious options to decrease the verbosity. We did not make any changes to the backup script itself, so the mmbackup invocation is the same. Any ideas? Thanks\u2026</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Kevin</div>
<div class="">
<div class="">\u2014</div>
<div class="">Kevin Buterbaugh - Senior System Administrator</div>
<div class="">Vanderbilt University - Advanced Computing Center for Research and Education</div>
<div class=""><a href="mailto:Kevin.Buterbaugh@vanderbilt.edu" class="">Kevin.Buterbaugh@vanderbilt.edu</a> - (615)875-9633</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<br class="">
</body>
</html>