<font size=2 face="sans-serif">have you checked, where th fsmgr runs as
you have nodes with different code levels</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">mmlsmgr </font><br><br><br><br><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"Buterbaugh, Kevin
L" <Kevin.Buterbaugh@Vanderbilt.Edu></font><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">gpfsug main discussion
list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org></font><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">01/18/2017 04:57 PM</font><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">[gpfsug-discuss]
mmrepquota and group names in GPFS 4.2.2.x</font><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Sent by:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org</font><br><hr noshade><br><br><br><font size=3>Hi All, </font><br><br><font size=3>We recently upgraded our cluster (well, the servers are
all upgraded; the clients are still in progress) from GPFS 4.2.1.1 to GPFS
4.2.2.1 and there appears to be a change in how mmrepquota handles group
names in its’ output. I’m trying to get a handle on it, because
it is messing with some of my scripts and - more importantly - because
I don’t understand the behavior.</font><br><br><font size=3>From one of my clients which is still running GPFS 4.2.1.1
I can run an “mmrepquota -g <fs>” and if the group exists in /etc/group
the group name is displayed. Of course, if the group doesn’t exist
in /etc/group, the GID is displayed. Makes sense.</font><br><br><font size=3>However, on my servers which have been upgraded to GPFS
4.2.2.1 most - but not all - of the time I see GID numbers instead of group
names. My question is, what is the criteria GPFS 4.2.2.x is using
to decide when to display a GID instead of a group name? It’s apparently
*not* the length of the name of the group, because I have output in front
of me where a 13 character long group name is displayed but a 7 character
long group name is *not* displayed - its’ GID is instead (and yes, both
exist in /etc/group).</font><br><br><font size=3>I know that sample output would be useful to illustrate
this, but I do not want to post group names or GIDs to a public mailing
list … if you want to know what those are, you’ll have to ask Vladimir
Putin… ;-)</font><br><br><font size=3>I am in the process of updating scripts to use “mmrepquota
-gn <fs>” and then looking up the group name myself, but I want
to try to understand this. Thanks…</font><br><br><font size=3>Kevin<br></font><br><font size=3>—</font><br><font size=3>Kevin Buterbaugh - Senior System Administrator</font><br><font size=3>Vanderbilt University - Advanced Computing Center for
Research and Education</font><br><a href=mailto:Kevin.Buterbaugh@vanderbilt.edu><font size=3 color=blue><u>Kevin.Buterbaugh@vanderbilt.edu</u></font></a><font size=3>- (615)875-9633</font><br><br><br><tt><font size=2>_______________________________________________<br>gpfsug-discuss mailing list<br>gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<br></font></tt><a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss"><tt><font size=2>http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br></font></tt><br><br><BR>