[gpfsug-discuss] [EXTERNAL] - Building kernel module on RHEL10
Laurence Horrocks-Barlow
lhorrocks-barlow at ocf.co.uk
Tue May 12 20:26:49 BST 2026
Good spot, I agree it should be pulled as a dependency.
Have you raised this as a support call or RFI?
Laurence Horrocks-Barlow | Technical Director
[https://ocf.co.uk/media/1njni4oz/ocf.png]<https://www.ocf.co.uk/>
Phone:
0114 257 2200
Address:
OCF Limited, Unit 5 Rotunda Business Centre, Thorncliffe Park, Chapeltown, Sheffield S35 2PG
Website:
http://www.ocf.co.uk/<http://www.ocf.co.uk/>
[LinkedIn icon]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/ocf-limited/> [Twitter icon] <https://twitter.com/ocf_hpc?lang=en>
[https://ocf.co.uk/media/ezzcb21y/banner.jpg]
OCF Limited is a company registered in England and Wales. Registered number 4132533, VAT number GB 780 6803 14. Registered office address: OCF Limited, 5 Rotunda Business Centre, Thorncliffe Park, Chapeltown, Sheffield, S35 2PG.
This message is private and confidential. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately and remove it from your system.
Laurence Horrocks-Barlow|Technical Director
Phone:+44 (0)114 257 2200
Address:OCF Limited, Unit 5 Rotunda Business Centre,
​Thorncliffe Park, Chapeltown, S35 2PG
FOR NEW / EXISTING SUPPORT OR MANAGED SERVICES TICKETS GO TO: HELPDESK.OCF.CO.UK
________________________________
From: gpfsug-discuss <gpfsug-discuss-bounces at gpfsug.org> on behalf of Jonathan Buzzard via gpfsug-discuss <gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org>
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2026 5:55:14 PM
To: gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org <gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org>
Cc: Jonathan Buzzard <jonathan.buzzard at strath.ac.uk>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] - [gpfsug-discuss] Building kernel module on RHEL10
Just an FYI so you don't bash your head against a brick wall like I did.
The mmbuildgpl script assumes that which is installed and as they say
assumptions are the mother of all screw ups.
Turns out on RHEL10 when you do a minimal install, which is not part of
the minimal install and it's not a dependency of any of the GPFS RPMs.
The outcome of which is you get cryptic messages about various stuff
being installed but not in the expected location. That's because the
script tests for say the make RPM and then uses which to test its
location but as which is not installed the test fails.
Two options; either the GPFS RPMs should have the which package as a
dependency or mmbuildgpl script should test that it is installed and
warn if it is not.
JAB.
--
Jonathan A. Buzzard Tel: +44141-5483420
HPC System Administrator, ARCHIE-WeSt.
University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Building, Glasgow. G4 0NG
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org<http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20260512/4ab3d432/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image337948.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12422 bytes
Desc: image337948.png
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20260512/4ab3d432/attachment.png>
More information about the gpfsug-discuss
mailing list